Life expectancy +3 months every year since 1840
75% older adults report being in good to excellent health
70% report chronic health conditions
Wouters 2017; Christensen 2009; Older Americans 2012
US health care system faces shortfalls in primary care physicians and paid caregivers
50% need or receive help with routine activities
Baby boomers: 45M adults 65+ as of 2015
Bodenheimer 2009; Scommegna 2016; US Census 2015
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/03/167-years-of-the-us-age-demographic-in-one-chart
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/03/167-years-of-the-us-age-demographic-in-one-chart
96% of older adults live independently in homes/apartments
75% strongly agree: want to stay in current residence for as long as possible
Need help: majority of the help is family. Changes in family dynamics: more older adults without living spouses, or adult children within 10 miles.
"Self-care of chronic conditions will therefore be an important component of the aging process, while family members will feel increased pressure to make up for gaps in care availability"
96% of older adults live independently in homes/apartments
75% want to stay in current residence for as long as possible
Benefits
Trade-Offs
CDC Healthy Places; Mather2015
reduced health care costs: avoid expensive institutional care
limit aging effects: cognitive decline and depression
inconsistent monitoring: not seeing physician regularly, fear of institutionalization, etc.
Use in-home, passive wireless motion, contact and appliance sensors
Allow older adults to age in place
Monitor health and daily activities of older adult
Connect caregivers and health- and elder-care providers
In order to enable long-term management of chronic conditions while aging in place, there is a need for technological solutions in the home that facilitate self-care activities, connect older adults with primary care physicians and elder care service providers as well as informal family caregivers.
Difficult to capture and label realistic, nature patterns of daily living
Passive sensor systems need to be minimally invasive
Low-cost and easy to deploy and maintain at large scales
Can we effectively use passively-recorded,
unlabelled sensor data to characterize
lifestyle activity patterns to enable
detection of changes in routine?
Can we effectively use passively-recorded,
unlabelled sensor data to characterize
lifestyle activity patterns to enable
detection of changes in routine?
HomeSense
Activity Profiles
Occupant Identification using
Activity Profiles
Health BOOST, University of South Florida
Recruitment
14 total participants (7 ongoing)
12 have completed at least 6 months
7 Participants
Completed at least 196 days (~7 months):
Similar floorplan and sensor layout
Gather sensor event sequences
Group into day-length event sequences
Build activity profiles from day-event sequences
Timestamp | Sensor | Encoded |
---|---|---|
2017-10-01 14:01:44 | InLivingRoom | A |
2017-10-01 14:05:28 | InLivingRoom | A |
2017-10-01 14:26:25 | InKitchen | E |
2017-10-01 14:28:34 | OpenedGarageDoor | G |
2017-10-01 14:28:35 | InLivingRoom | A |
2017-10-01 14:28:58 | ClosedGarageDoor | g |
2017-10-01 14:29:07 | InBedroomMaster | I |
2017-10-01 14:29:16 | InBathroomMaster | i |
2017-10-01 14:36:39 | InBathroomMaster | i |
Type | Length | Character |
---|---|---|
Short | 15 to 60 minutes | 1 |
Medium | 1 to 3 hours | 2 |
Long | 3+ hours | 3 |
Day Start Marker: 5 sequential active events after 4am
IiIAEFfFfA2AE1EGAgEAIiIAEIiIiOiIGAgEIIIAE1AE2AEAAE1A1AAEIiIFfFfAEA2AEAE1AEEAAEAEAA1AIiI2AEIiI3IIiI2
IiIAEFfFfA2AE1EGAgEAIiIAEIiIiOiIGAgEIIIAE1AE2AEAAE1A1AAEIiIFfFfAEA2AEAE1AEEAAEAEAA1AIiI2AEIiI3IIiI2
Similar to document categorization [Cavnar1994]
Counted and ranked n-grams in category documents
Compared n-grams from unknown document to category profiles
Activity Profile
For m day-event sequences:
IiIAEF ... 3IIiI2
_I iI IA AE EF ... 3I II Ii iI 2_
_Ii iIA IAE AEF ... 3II IIi IiI I2_
...
Day Activity Profile
ngram | count | freq |
---|---|---|
AE | 15 | 0.02618 |
iI | 8 | 0.01396 |
EA | 7 | 0.01222 |
Ii | 7 | 0.01222 |
IiI | 6 | 0.01047 |
1A | 5 | 0.00873 |
AEA | 5 | 0.00873 |
2A | 4 | 0.00698 |
2AE | 4 | 0.00698 |
AA | 4 | 0.00698 |
450 n-grams
Day Activity Profile
ngram | count | freq |
---|---|---|
AE | 15 | 0.02618 |
iI | 8 | 0.01396 |
EA | 7 | 0.01222 |
Ii | 7 | 0.01222 |
IiI | 6 | 0.01047 |
1A | 5 | 0.00873 |
AEA | 5 | 0.00873 |
2A | 4 | 0.00698 |
2AE | 4 | 0.00698 |
AA | 4 | 0.00698 |
450 n-grams
Activity Profile
ngram | count | freq |
---|---|---|
AE | 329 | 0.01541 |
1A | 283 | 0.01326 |
Gg | 208 | 0.00974 |
EA | 193 | 0.00904 |
AA | 170 | 0.00796 |
iI | 168 | 0.00787 |
1AE | 146 | 0.00684 |
Ff | 139 | 0.00651 |
A1 | 134 | 0.00628 |
A1A | 132 | 0.00618 |
7,840 n-grams
Comparing Activity Profile P to Daily Activity Profile Q
Kullback-Leibler Distance (Symmetric)
D(P∥Q)=∑x∈χ((P(x)−Q(x))logP(x)Q(x))
with back-off
P(tk,dj)={βP(tk|dj)if tk occurs in document djϵotherwiseβ=1−∑k∉di,k∈Pϵ
Bigi 2003
KL divergence is a measure of the difference between two probability distributions over the same event space
KLJ or KL distance is symmetric version
Do Activity Profiles capture occupant's unique patterns?
How many days of activity are needed?
Can we use a activity profiles as baseline as occupant ages?
How well do Activity Profiles work?
Build profile for each occupant from N training days
Use profiles to identify occupant of test day
7-fold modified cross validation:
How many days are needed for quality Activity Profiles?
N profile days:
Profiles: 168 days (~6 months)
Test: 28 days
Profile Days | Months | Iterations | Reps | Total Trials |
---|---|---|---|---|
14 | 0.5 | 12 | 1 | 12 |
28 | 1.0 | 6 | 2 | 12 |
42 | 1.5 | 4 | 3 | 12 |
56 | 2.0 | 3 | 4 | 12 |
70 | 2.5 | 2 | 6 | 12 |
84 | 3.0 | 2 | 6 | 12 |
14 Days | 28 Days | 42 Days | 56 Days | 70 Days | 84 Days | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accuracy | 0.944 | 0.959 | 0.962 | 0.960 | 0.959 | 0.954 |
Precision | 0.949 | 0.962 | 0.965 | 0.962 | 0.962 | 0.957 |
Recall | 0.944 | 0.959 | 0.962 | 0.960 | 0.959 | 0.954 |
F Meas. | 0.944 | 0.959 | 0.962 | 0.960 | 0.959 | 0.954 |
Activity Profiles
Accurately characterize smart home occupant daily activities
Useful for long-term monitoring of older adults as they age
Use simple, passive sensors emebedded in home environment
Do not require expensive activity labelling for training
Future Work
Questions? gadenbuie@mail.usf.edu
Future work: clustering for unsupervised activity discovery
Limitations: obviously, no labels, etc.
Wouters (2017). Handbook of Smart Homes, Health Care and Well-Being
Christensen et al. (2009). doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61460-4
Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics (2012). Older Americans 2012
Bodenheimer et al. (2009). doi:10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.64
Scommegna (2016). Today’s Research on Aging
U. S. Census Bureau (2017). https://factfinder.census.gov/bkmk/table/1.0/en/ACS/15_5YR/S0103/0100000US
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017). https://www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/terminology.htm
Mather et al. (2015). Aging in the United States
Cavnar & Trenkle (1994). N Proceedings of SDAIR-94, 3rd Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval
Bigi (2003). Advances in Information Retrieval
Life expectancy +3 months every year since 1840
75% older adults report being in good to excellent health
70% report chronic health conditions
Wouters 2017; Christensen 2009; Older Americans 2012
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
Esc | Back to slideshow |